Young Research & Publishing Inc.

Investment Research Since 1978

Disclosure

  • About Us
    • Contributors
    • Archives
    • The Final Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
    • Dick Young’s Research Key: Anecdotal Evidence Gathering
    • Crisis at Vanguard
  • Investment Analysis
    • Bonds
    • Currencies and Gold
    • Dividend Investing
    • ETFs & Funds
    • Investment Strategy
    • Retirement Investing
    • Stocks
    • The Efficient Frontier
  • Investment Counsel
  • Dynamic Maximizers®
  • Retirement Compounders®
  • Free Email Signup
  • Dick Young’s Safe America

A Dubious Tax Proposal

May 18, 2017 By Jeremy Jones, CFA

President Obama is on the campaign trail promoting the Buffett Rule that the Senate will likely vote on in coming days. The Buffett Rule would slap a minimum tax rate of 30% on anyone who makes more than $1 million per year. Billionaire Warren Buffett came up with the idea. Apparently, he was disturbed by the fact that he pays a lower tax rate than his secretary. Why Buffett is focused on his rate rather than the $7 million he forked over to Uncle Sam is, well, confounding, but I’ll come back to that.

If implemented, the Buffett Rule wouldn’t even begin to make a dent in the budget deficit. Estimates show implementation would raise no more than $50 billion over 10 years. The Congressional Budget Office projects cumulative deficits of almost $11 trillion over the same time period. For those of you not doing the math, the Buffett Rule would reduce the cumulative deficit by a whopping 0.45%. And 0.45% may be on the high side. The nation’s highest income earners are a savvy group. When you change the tax rules, they hire teams of accountants and lawyers to minimize their tax liability. Decades of experience show that when the government raises tax rates, revenue doesn’t increase as a share of the economy. Instead, higher tax rates create distortions in the economy as individuals focus on tax avoidance.

Clearly, then, the Buffett Rule isn’t a revenue-raising scheme. But why would the president propose a tax hike that doesn’t raise much revenue? Political calculus is no doubt one of his primary motivations. Polls show that over 60% of Americans support the Buffett Rule.

The president also claims that America needs a Buffett Rule because it is not fair that Warren Buffett pays a lower tax rate than his secretary. Here is what Obama said at a campaign speech in Florida last week: “You might have heard of this, but Warren Buffett is paying a lower tax rate than his secretary. Now, that’s wrong. That’s not fair.”

It’s a fascinating argument. Let me try to get this straight. Warren Buffett and his secretary are both U.S. citizens, and they both receive the same government services. But because Mr. Buffett pays $7 million for his share of government services and his secretary pays maybe 1% of that, she is getting a raw deal. I don’t know what dictionary the president is using, but it doesn’t seem like Buffett’s secretary is being treated unfairly. It seems to me that the only thing that isn’t fair here is that Mr. Buffett has to pay $7 million to receive the same government services most Americans get for a fraction of that cost.

The Buffett Rule is bad policy. It will not raise meaningful revenue, it will distort the economy, and it will hinder economic growth.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

You Might Also Like:

  • Here’s Why Sanders’ Tax Plan Could Usher in a Wave of Tax Avoidance
  • Happy Tax Freedom Day!
  • Companies Celebrate Tax Reform
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Jeremy Jones, CFA
Jeremy Jones, CFA, CFP® is the Director of Research at Young Research & Publishing Inc., and the Chief Investment Officer at Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. was ranked #10 in CNBC's 2019 Financial Advisor Top 100. Jeremy is also a contributing editor of youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Jeremy Jones, CFA (see all)
  • Whether Through Audacity or Ignorance, Stock Fundamentals Are Being Ignored - January 19, 2021
  • Jim Simons’s Renaissance Technologies vs. Internet Forum Traders - January 15, 2021
  • Biden Plans to Spend Trillions More on COVID-19 Stimulus - January 14, 2021

Search Young Research

Most Popular

  • Vanguard Wellesley (VWINX) vs. Wellington (VWELX): Which Fund is Best?
  • Do You Remember When NASDAQ Dropped by 82%?
  • The Power of a Compound Interest Table
  • The Highest Yielding S&P 500 Stocks
  • Gavekal Chairman: Renewables Bubble is "Stupidest" Ever
  • Don’t Be on Their Radar, Get Out of Debt Now
  • There's Always a Way Forward for Americans Like YOU
  • Overtaken By Nvidia, Intel Fires Bob Swan
  • Stocks: Are You Sticking Your Neck Out Too Far?
  • Democrats Eager to Get Back to Protecting the Rich by Ending SALT Deduction Cap

Don’t Miss

Default Risk Among the Many Concerns with Annuities

Risk and Reward: An Efficient Frontier

How to be a Billionaire: Proven Strategies from the Titans of Wealth

Could this Be the Vanguard GNMA Winning Edge?

Cryptocosm and Life After Google

Warning: Avoid Mutual Fund Year End Distributions

Is Gold a Good Long-term Investment?

How to Invest in Gold

Vanguard Wellington (VWELX): The Original Balanced Fund

What is the Best Gold ETF for Investing and Trading?

Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock: The Only True Dividend King

The Dividend King of the North

You’ll Love This if You’re Dreaming of an Active Retirement Life

RSS The Latest at Richardcyoung.com

  • The Recklessness of Arnold Schwarzenegger
  • Warmongering Firestarters Victoria Nuland and Samantha Powers Back
  • Smith Family Robinson in Live Free or Die, NH
  • Dick Young’s Safe America: Chapter 1, Part I
  • RCY’s Brand New Investing Program – 100% Swiss
  • Swiss Francs, a Store of Value
  • Insurrection Was the Furthest Thing from Trump’s Mind
  • Who Are Those Urging Violence?
  • Are $2,000 Checks Going to Rebuild NYC?
  • An Alert for Warm Weather, Wine Loving Mavens.

About Us

  • About Young Research
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Our Partners

  • Richard C. Young & Co.
  • Richardcyoung.com

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Pinterest

Copyright © 2021 | Terms & Conditions

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.