Young Research & Publishing Inc.

Investment Research Since 1978

Disclosure

  • About Us
    • Contributors
    • Archives
    • Dick Young’s Safe America
    • The Final Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
    • Dick Young’s Research Key: Anecdotal Evidence Gathering
    • Crisis at Vanguard
  • Investment Analysis
    • Bonds
    • Currencies and Gold
    • Dividend Investing
    • ETFs & Funds
    • Investment Strategy
    • Retirement Investing
    • Stocks
    • The Efficient Frontier
  • Investment Counsel
  • Dynamic Maximizers®
  • Retirement Compounders®
  • Free Email Signup

Jobless Claims Spike: Will the Fed Overreact?

April 13, 2012 By Young Research

According to today’s report, initial claims for jobless benefits spiked to 380,000, the highest since January (See chart below). Compounding the fear about the recovery in jobs was the less than stellar growth logged in payrolls last week. Only 120,000 jobs were created in March, substantially underperforming average economists’ estimates which ranged closer to 200,000. Other economic data contradict the recent bad news. GDP is growing around trend, cars a selling fast and sentiment is trending upward. It’s safe to say that the economic data are mixed.

Initial Weekly Jobless Claims

Also mixed is the interpretation of the data by Federal Reserve officials. The St. Louis Fed’s president, James Bullard has taken a cautious but optimistic view of the mixed data. He has been arguing against the Fed’s policy of waiting until 2014 to normalize rates, saying “The Committee’s practice of including distant dates in the statement sends an unwarranted pessimistic signal concerning the future of the U.S. economy.”  Arguing against a third round of quantitative easing that may cause inflation, Bullard said “As the U.S. economy continues to rebound and repair, additional policy actions may create an over-commitment to ultra-easy monetary policy.”

Bullard’s hawkishness is not shared among the majority of Federal Reserve Open Market Committee members. Leading the dovish arm is the Fed Board of Governors Vice Chair, Janet Yellen. She said in a speech in New York yesterday “I consider a highly accommodative policy stance to be appropriate in present circumstances.”

The FOMC doves indicate through their statements that they believe the persistent high unemployment rate is caused by cyclical as opposed to structural factors.  This is convenient for Fed policy makers because their academic models support the idea that monetary can help when unemployment is cyclical.

If unemployment is structural monetary policy is ineffective and in many cases counterproductive. Structural unemployment is caused by a mismatch between the skills of the unemployed workers and the skills demanded by employers. For example, if employers are hiring software engineers, but the majority of the unemployed are former carpenters and retail clerks, one might conclude unemployment is structural.  Lowering interest rates isn’t going to allow a carpenter to take a job as a software engineer. In her speech Vice Chair Yellen said,

Some observers question just how large the shortfall from full employment really is and hence worry that further increases in aggregate demand could push up inflation. Their concern is that a large part of the rise in unemployment since 2007 is structural rather than cyclical. I agree that the magnitude of structural unemployment is uncertain, but I read the evidence as supporting the view that the bulk of the rise in unemployment that we saw in recent years was cyclical, not structural in nature.

Yellen doubles down on the notion that monetary policy can effectively fight today’s unemployment. She explains that today’s unemployment (which she believes to be cyclical) could lead to structural unemployment if left to fester. Her suggestion is that the Fed ought to keep pouring on the monetary stimulus until unemployment comes down. But that hasn’t worked yet, and there is no evidence it will.

While I do not see much evidence of any significant increase in structural unemployment so far, I am concerned that structural unemployment could increase over time if the labor market heals too slowly–a phenomenon known as hysteresis. An exceptionally large fraction of those now unemployed–more than 40 percent–have been out of work for six months or more. My concern is that individuals with such long unemployment spells could become less employable as their skills deteriorate and as they lose their connections to the labor market. This outcome does not appear to have occurred in the wake of previous U.S. recessions, but the fraction of the unemployed who have been out of work for a long period is much higher now than it has been in the past. To date, I have not seen evidence that hysteresis is occurring to any substantial degree. For example, the probability of finding a new job has not deteriorated more for individuals experiencing a long-term bout of unemployment relative to those facing shorter spells. Nonetheless, the risk that continued high unemployment could eventually lead to more-persistent structural problems underscores the case for maintaining a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy.

The mixed signals from economic data, and from the FOMC members themselves, argues for a wait and see approach. Pouring a third round of quantitative easing on an economy that is in mild recovery could spark an inflationary fire. Prudence is the best course for the Fed today.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

You Might Also Like:

  • Just How Low Can Jobless Claims Fall?
  • This is What Terrorizes the Fed
  • A Failed Fed Tightening
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Young Research
Latest posts by Young Research (see all)
  • Happy Memorial Day! - May 30, 2022
  • Happy Easter! - April 15, 2022
  • India and China Quietly Eschew Sanctions, Buy Russia’s Oil - March 24, 2022

Search Young Research

Most Popular

  • Will the Fed Stick to Its Course?
  • RECESSION? Dow 25,000, $8 Gas, Rising Interest Rates, Spell Mid-term Crack Up
  • Investing During a Recession
  • Swiss National Bank Surprises World with Rate Hike
  • Kellogg Cuts Loose with Split Plan
  • The Power of a Compound Interest Table
  • MONEY TALKS: The Best Service in Paris
  • Predictions of MEGA-SPENDING on Metaverse
  • Apple Shares Resilient in the Face of Recession
  • Vanguard Wellesley (VWINX) vs. Wellington (VWELX): Which Fund is Best?

Don’t Miss

Default Risk Among the Many Concerns with Annuities

Risk and Reward: An Efficient Frontier

How to be a Billionaire: Proven Strategies from the Titans of Wealth

Could this Be the Vanguard GNMA Winning Edge?

Cryptocosm and Life After Google

Warning: Avoid Mutual Fund Year End Distributions

Is Gold a Good Long-term Investment?

How to Invest in Gold

Vanguard Wellington (VWELX): The Original Balanced Fund

What is the Best Gold ETF for Investing and Trading?

Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock: The Only True Dividend King

The Dividend King of the North

You’ll Love This if You’re Dreaming of an Active Retirement Life

RSS The Latest at Richardcyoung.com

  • Greetings From Paris & Le Bristol Hotel
  • The Most Controversial Restaurant in Paris?
  • Your Survival Guy: Clearing the Decks, Buying a Boat, Seeing the World and More
  • Russia’s “Unsubtle” Artillery Attacks Not Necessarily “Archaic”
  • FLORIDA DODGED A BULLET: Elected Superb DeSantis Over Unstable Gillum
  • Biden, a Job Killing Machine
  • Good News for the 2nd Amendment
  • La Fontaine De Mars: Best Sunday Paris Lunch
  • My 10 Favorite Books about France, Plus a Bonus for You
  • BREAKING: Supreme Court DISMANTLES New York’s Unconstitutional Gun Laws

About Us

  • About Young Research
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Our Partners

  • Richard C. Young & Co.
  • Richardcyoung.com

Copyright © 2022 | Terms & Conditions

 

Loading Comments...
 

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.