Young Research & Publishing Inc.

Investment Research Since 1978

Disclosure

  • About Us
    • Contributors
    • Archives
    • Dick Young’s Safe America
    • The Final Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
    • Dick Young’s Research Key: Anecdotal Evidence Gathering
    • Crisis at Vanguard
  • Investment Analysis
    • Bonds
    • Currencies and Gold
    • Dividend Investing
    • ETFs & Funds
    • Investment Strategy
    • Retirement Investing
    • Stocks
    • The Efficient Frontier
  • Investment Counsel
  • Dynamic Maximizers®
  • Retirement Compounders®
  • Free Email Signup

GMO on the Risk-Reward in Stocks and Competitive Capitalism

May 26, 2020 By Jeremy Jones, CFA

By Olivier Le Moal @ Shutterstock.com

Jeremy Grantham’s GMO often offers useful insight. GMO’s head of asset allocation was interviewed by Barron’s recently.

Below are some of the highlights. Emphasis is ours.

Barron’s: You just more than halved the stock allocation in your flagship funds. What’s worrying you?

Ben Inker: We were getting very nervous about how much the markets had gone up. The risk/reward trade-off for equities had really gotten a lot worse than it was in March. Value stocks at this point are trading at some of the widest spreads we have ever seen.

The optimistic scenario is: We get a vaccine relatively quickly, or some affordable, very effective treatment for Covid-19 that allows us to go back to a normal economy. With the extraordinary rally we’ve seen from March, stocks are priced for that outcome. But in the event of that outcome, we expect that the stocks that will go up the most are the ones that got hit the worst on the way down and have not fully recovered. If people are willing to get in airplanes and go to restaurants and to concerts again, well, those companies that took the huge hit should be the biggest beneficiaries.

The less optimistic scenario is: We don’t get something that enables us to bring the economy back to life, and it takes a few very difficult years before we’re back to anything approaching normal. As of March 23, stocks around the world were priced for that. Since then, we’ve seen a rally of 25% to 30%-plus. To put that in perspective, a group of stocks trading at fair value deserves a real return [after inflation] of about 5% a year. So we’ve gotten somewhere between four and maybe as much as seven years’ worth of returns from stocks in seven weeks.

But you still own some U.S. stocks—in case the optimists are correct?

In early April, we were buyers of stocks with a cyclical focus. Certain industries have been hit very hard: hotels, airlines, energy, autos, and certain industrials. Even if the economic problems last a long time, the strongest companies in those spaces will make it through. Now, we’ve just shorted the market against them.

How overvalued are U.S. stocks?

We thought the S&P 500 was really quite overvalued coming into this. Our best estimate of fair value for the S&P is something a little bit south of 2000. [The S&P 500 closed at 2955.45on Friday.] So even at the March lows, it didn’t look cheap to us, but it had just fallen 33%, and the market seemed to be taking the pandemic pretty seriously. So in late March and early April, we were buying risk assets—international large- and small- caps, emerging market stocks, cyclical stocks, high-yield credit. There were a lot of risky assets that were priced with a reasonable margin of safety. And then they all went up.

Does that cause you to wonder if you should tweak your model to take secular changes into account?

Over the course of those 20 years, we have done a lot of digging into our assumptions, to understand where things have played out differently than we expected. One of the striking [observations]: Profitability around most of the world has been stable. Profitability for U.S. small- and mid-cap stocks has been stable. The one place that was absolutely not the case is U.S. large- caps, which have seen profitability, and their apparent return on capital, move up in a way that is fairly unique.

What’s going on?

Some of it is indeed driven by secular change: Health care and tech have structurally higher returns on capital. The U.S. market has more of them than other markets, and their weight in the U.S. has come up. But even more striking is that in the U.S., a tremendous number of industries have become more concentrated—and the profitability of those industries has gone up. One difference between the U.S. and everywhere else is that we have tolerated—perhaps even encouraged—an amount of consolidation that would not be allowed elsewhere. We’ve created oligopolies, and oligopolies have a pretty good return on capital.

They sound like great investments.

One thing you could say—which is almost certainly a bad idea—is, “Well, that’s the trend; let’s assume it continues.” And that would be ever-more industry concentration, and more and more profit would accrete to the very largest firms. That kind of trend is never sustainable, and it’s always dangerous to assume it’s going to continue.

What’s a more likely outcome?

Over the next 20 years, the world will probably be less friendly to the giants than it is today. And I would bet that the next 20 years see a slowly deteriorating return on capital for U.S. large-cap stocks. But it’s not going to be a natural occurrence, driven by competitive capitalism, because we have thrown sand in the gears of competitive capitalism.

How have we thrown sand in the gears of competitive capitalism?

It’s pretty straightforward: We used to have a world where we would not have allowed four wireless companies to turn into three, or seven major airlines to turn into four, because we wanted to maintain enough players to have competition, which is good for consumers. We allowed Facebook [ticker: FB] to buy up companies that could have plausibly become future competitors. That probably wasn’t a great idea. It’s not too late to change our treatment of future potential mergers, and change the way we regulate the companies.

If it is truly the case that social media and search are “natural monopolies,” we understand how to treat natural monopolies. Utilities are a natural monopoly, and we regulate their return on capital. U.S. large-cap companies have been able to get away with profitability that nobody else has, because they don’t have many competitors. Over time, you want a world where there is competition. If there are situations where competition is not possible, society should have another way of dealing with the fruits of that dominant position.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

You Might Also Like:

  • Learn How Risk Reward & Time Are Related
  • Stocks Crater 831 Points
  • Grantham’s GMO says U.S. Stock Bubble is Busting
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Jeremy Jones, CFA
Jeremy Jones, CFA, CFP® is the Director of Research at Young Research & Publishing Inc., and the Chief Investment Officer at Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. was ranked #5 in CNBC's 2021 Financial Advisor Top 100. Jeremy is also a contributing editor of youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Jeremy Jones, CFA (see all)
  • BULLWHIPPED? Inventory Overhang Could Slow Growth in Certain Sectors - May 20, 2022
  • MARKET TURNING: Canada’s Housing Market Turmoil - May 19, 2022
  • HORDING CASH: Funds Hold the Highest Level of Cash Since 9/11 - May 18, 2022

Search Young Research

Most Popular

  • MARKET CHAOS: This May Take Time, Here’s How to Prepare
  • PRICES SOAR: Diesel Shortage Could Cripple America's Economy
  • Your Survival Guy: “Sell in May, Buy After Labor Day?”
  • All-Powerful Money Managers Voting YOUR Money Targeted by Senate GOP
  • Institutional Investors Fall in Love with Oil, Again
  • COMMODITY CRUNCH: Will Tesla Buy a Cobalt Mine?
  • CRYPTO: Has the Fire Gone Out?
  • The Innovation Bubble Goes Bust
  • Don’t Throw Your Bond Portfolio Out the Window
  • The Power of a Compound Interest Table

Don’t Miss

Default Risk Among the Many Concerns with Annuities

Risk and Reward: An Efficient Frontier

How to be a Billionaire: Proven Strategies from the Titans of Wealth

Could this Be the Vanguard GNMA Winning Edge?

Cryptocosm and Life After Google

Warning: Avoid Mutual Fund Year End Distributions

Is Gold a Good Long-term Investment?

How to Invest in Gold

Vanguard Wellington (VWELX): The Original Balanced Fund

What is the Best Gold ETF for Investing and Trading?

Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock: The Only True Dividend King

The Dividend King of the North

You’ll Love This if You’re Dreaming of an Active Retirement Life

RSS The Latest at Richardcyoung.com

  • Joe Biden – Malicious, Incompetent, a Wannabe Left Wing Ideologue?
  • Jean-Pierre: Economy “Not Something that We Keep an Eye on Every Day”
  • Job Market Survival Advice for Graduates and for Those YOU Love
  • The Destructive Rise and Fall of BLM
  • What Would We Do without the Experts?
  • V4 Stands Against North African and Middle Eastern Invasion
  • BUY THE DIPS? Can You Catch a Ginsu Knife?
  • Florida: Enjoy Certain Freedoms and Individual Liberties
  • ENERGY FREEDOM ACT: Ted Cruz Introduces Bill for Energy Independence
  • Consequences of Biden Killing the Keystone Pipeline

About Us

  • About Young Research
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Our Partners

  • Richard C. Young & Co.
  • Richardcyoung.com

Copyright © 2022 | Terms & Conditions

 

Loading Comments...
 

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.