Young Research & Publishing Inc.

Investment Research Since 1978

Disclosure

  • About Us
    • Contributors
    • Archives
    • The Final Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
    • Dick Young’s Research Key: Anecdotal Evidence Gathering
    • Crisis at Vanguard
  • Investing Analysis
    • Bonds
    • Currencies and Gold
    • Dividend Investing
    • ETFs & Funds
    • Investment Strategy
    • Retirement Investing
    • Stocks
    • The Efficient Frontier
  • Money Management
  • Dynamic Maximizers®
  • Retirement Compounders®
  • Free Email Signup

Robinhood Markets? No Such Thing as a Free Lunch

October 16, 2018 By Jeremy Jones, CFA

By Constantin Stanciu @ Shutterstock.com

Despite offering no-fee stock trades, Robinhood Markets is still getting paid. The company is using a controversial process called “payment for order flow,” to generate revenue. Despite its “free” trades, investors should always remember that there’s no such thing as a free lunch. Bloomberg’s Simone Foxman, Julie Verhage and Suzanne Woolley report:

Here’s how it works: Retail brokers like Robinhood focus on recruiting customers and building the trading interface, but don’t actually execute their clients’ orders. They outsource that to firms—including Citadel, Two Sigma and Wolverine Securities—that pay for the right to handle those trades. While orders from large, sophisticated investors can burn the market maker who executes the trade, retail trades are considered relatively safe.

These firms earn a tiny bit of money off each transaction, often 1 cent or less per share. Some see payment for order flow as a critical piece of market infrastructure—facilitating the fast and cheap buying and selling of stocks. But critics of high-frequency trading have long argued that the practice actually hurts the little guy, to the advantage of large firms. Federal rules dictate that brokers must seek the best execution for clients’ trades, but finding the best price possible is not necessarily a requirement. Consumer advocates say the system creates an incentive for brokers to route orders to the market maker that pays the most.

During last year’s fourth quarter, regulatory disclosures indicated that Robinhood shipped virtually all of its orders for stock trades to four high-speed market makers. The bulk was bought by Citadel, an affiliate of Ken Griffin’s $30 billion hedge fund. Citadel paid Robinhood an average of “less than $0.0024 per share” on the trades it was routed in that quarter. Those small numbers add up—Robinhood’s users have executed more than $150 billion in transactions.

During that quarter in 2017, Citadel and Two Sigma paid the company more per share of order flow than they paid TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., E*Trade Financial Corp. and Charles Schwab Corp., filings show. Robinhood was also allocating more of its orders to Citadel than it was to Two Sigma, which offered rebates that were a third smaller per share, and to Wolverine, which paid it even less per share.

It’s no longer possible to compare Robinhood’s payments with other brokers’. In an unusual move earlier this year, the company began filing disclosures on payment for order flow in terms of dollars traded instead of shares traded. “We report our rebate structure on a per-dollar basis because this accurately reflects the arrangement we have with market makers,” Robinhood said in another new section of its website, following questions from Bloomberg. It also said the structure benefits people who are trading small amounts of stock.

Today, on a per dollar basis, “all market makers with whom we work have the same rebate rate,” Tenev wrote in his letter. He also said that the rebates allowed the company to charge consumers less, “Robinhood’s zero-commission model has unlocked the ability for every American, not just large institutions, to participate in a variety of investing strategies that were previously economically unfeasible.” Of the pricing, Tenev said, “Robinhood earns ~$0.00026 in rebates per dollar traded. That means if you buy a stock for $100.00, Robinhood earns 2.6 cents from the market maker.”

Some experts say payment for order flow can benefit retail customers, with little adverse impact. “If you’re an investor and you’re holding things for six months, a year, or two years and you lose out on half a penny, or a tenth, or two-tenths of a cent, it’s immaterial,” said Larry Tabb, chief research officer of Tabb Group, a consulting firm that works with high-frequency trading firms.

But regulators have scrutinized both brokers and market makers over rebates in recent years. TD Ameritrade, for example, faces a class-action lawsuit alleging its use of the payment- for-order-flow system is unfair. The company said it disagreed and would appeal.

Whatever the impact on consumers, some believe payments for order flow may not be a sustainable revenue source for Robinhood, thanks to regulatory pressures and consumer ire. “Robinhood’s revenue model could easily disappear,” said Tyler Gellasch, executive director of Healthy Markets, an investor advocacy group. “They’ve made it clear that they are comfortable living on this regulatory edge.”

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

You Might Also Like:

  • The Four Stocks Propping up Global Equity Markets
  • Automation is Making Markets more Volatile
  • The Calmest Market on Record
  • Author
  • Recent Posts

Jeremy Jones, CFA

Jeremy Jones, CFA is the Director of Research at Young Research & Publishing Inc., and the Chief Investment Officer at Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. Jeremy is a contributing editor of youngresearch.com.

Latest posts by Jeremy Jones, CFA (see all)

  • Is Brexit Good or is Brexit Bad? - December 13, 2019
  • High Dividend Small Cap Stocks: Should You Invest? - December 12, 2019
  • Is USMCA Ratification Imminent? - December 11, 2019

Search Young Research

Most Popular

  • Preferred Stock vs. Common Stock: What You Need to Know
  • Your Retirement Life: This State is Dominant Once Again
  • Vanguard GNMA Outlook 2020
  • This is What Troubles Me About Safe Deposit Boxes
  • The Power of a Compound Interest Table
  • A Tax-Free Savings Plan for Your Grandchild
  • The First Question You Should Ask Before Investing
  • Rich State, Poor State Rankings: This One Tops New England
  • Your Retirement Life: “My life Has Always Been One of Very Good Fortune”
  • Is USMCA Ratification Imminent?

DON’T MISS

Risk & Reward: An Efficient Frontier
The Highest Yielding S&P 500 Stocks
The Power of a Compound Interest Table
Is Gold a Good Long-term Investment?
How to Invest in Gold
You’ve Read the Last Intelligence Report, Now What?
For Investors who Want to Stop Worrying About a Market Crash
Dividend Kings: Are Dividend Kings the Best Dividend Stocks to Buy?
The Highest Yielding Dow Stocks
Vanguard Wellington (VWELX): The Original Balanced Fund
What is the Best Gold ETF for Investing and Trading?

RSS The Latest at Richardcyoung.com

  • Democrats Don’t Want Voters to Decide Trump’s Fate in 2020
  • Bribery and Extortion Gone Missing?
  • This is how Great Bobby Orr was During his Prime
  • Look at these Numbers: Can Trump Lose in 2020?
  • Impeachment – a Simple Way to Discredit Trump?
  • This is What Troubles Me About Safe Deposit Boxes
  • “Little” Mike Bloomberg Will Gut Your Second Amendment Rights
  • A Clear Attempt to Mislead and Deceive the American People
  • VIDEO: Loyal Trump Supporters Wait in the Rain for Massive PA Rally
  • Rich State, Poor State Rankings: This One Tops New England

About Us

  • About Young Research
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Our Partners

  • Richard C. Young & Co.
  • Richardcyoung.com

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Pinterest

Copyright © 2019 | Terms & Conditions

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.