Young Research & Publishing Inc.

Investment Research Since 1978

Disclosure

  • About Us
    • Contributors
    • Archives
    • Dick Young’s Safe America
    • The Final Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
    • Dick Young’s Research Key: Anecdotal Evidence Gathering
    • Crisis at Vanguard
  • Investment Analysis
    • Bonds
    • Currencies and Gold
    • Dividend Investing
    • ETFs & Funds
    • Investment Strategy
    • Retirement Investing
    • Stocks
    • The Efficient Frontier
  • Investment Counsel
  • Dynamic Maximizers®
  • Retirement Compounders®
  • Free Email Signup

The Genesis of Biden’s Capital Gains Tax Proposal

August 10, 2020 By Jeremy Jones, CFA

A President Biden would double the tax rate on capital gains. The highest marginal rate on capital gains would rise from 20% to 39.6%. Add on the Obamacare surtax of 3.8% and you are looking at a 43.4% tax rate on capital gains.

Why does Biden want to increase the capital gains tax rate? Do higher capital gains rates lead to more tax revenue?

It’s not even close. Lower, not higher, capital gains rates generate more capital gains tax revenue.

So why the focus on capital gains tax rate? For Biden and the progressive Left it’s about closing the wealth gap.

Will higher capital gains tax rates close the wealth gap? Sounds like a non-starter if a higher rate will generate less capital gains tax revenue. The most likely outcome of a higher capital gains tax rate is distortive incentives to avoid the taxes and a windfall for tax accountants, tax lawyers, and insurance companies.

If Biden really wanted to do something about the wealth gap, he would turn his attention to the Federal Reserve. The Fed’s focus on propping up financial asset prices owned by a small portion of the population exacerbated the wealth gap coming out of the financial crisis and it is doing the same today. Unemployment is high and private sector income is deeply depressed. Low- and moderate-income Americans have been hit especially hard in this recession, but stock and bond prices are only a whisper away from record highs. The Fed has played a leading role in the rally.

The political class rarely connects Fed policy to negative economic outcomes, but they should start. The end-result of years of the Fed encouraging misallocation, mispricing, and malinvestment with manipulated interest rates is an unbalanced economy. An economy where a candidate like Joe Biden decides he can solve the yawning wealth gap with yet another big-government solution.

The Wall Street Journal has more on Biden’s capital gains tax proposal.

Focus on the capital-gains proposal. No one has defined what is at stake here better than President John F. Kennedy, who wrote in 1963: “The tax on capital gains directly affects investment decisions, the mobility and flow of risk capital from static to more dynamic situations, the ease or difficulty experienced by new ventures in obtaining capital and thereby the strength and potential for growth of the economy.”

In addition to the federal tax of up to 43.4% under Mr. Biden’s proposal, there are state and local taxes on capital gains, which are no longer deductible for federal income tax purposes. Unless the deduction is reinstated, the total top long-term capital-gains tax bite under Mr. Biden’s plan would rise to well over 50% for residents of New York and California. (The Biden proposal doesn’t say how capital losses would be treated, but under current law they can be offset against ordinary income up to $3,000 a year.)

What are some of the economic implications of the proposals if enacted? First, there is the effect on individual realizations of long-term capital gains. At the American Council for Capital Formation we have monitored this effect closely for 42 years. Realizations of long-term capital gains—particularly those of high-income investors—are very sensitive to changes in capital-gains tax rates. Such investors respond to increases in these taxes by holding on to their gains for longer—sometimes indefinitely. There is no doubt that an approximate doubling of the top capital-gains tax rate would lead to a substantial reduction in the realization of long-term gains. The Congressional Budget Office estimates this elasticity is 1.2 in the short-run. This means that for each 1% increase in the capital-gains tax rate. there would be a 1.2% decline in capital gains realizations. But there hasn’t been a capital-gains tax increase of the magnitude proposed by Mr. Biden in recent history. The reduction in realizations it would cause could be even more severe than 1.2%.

In any case, a doubling of the top capital-gains tax rate would greatly restrict the mobility of individual capital, which Kennedy warned affects the flow of capital to new and smaller business ventures. Also, it would never raise anywhere near the tax revenues that its proponents claim. These claims are based on government tax-expenditure tables that use “static” analysis, ignoring the rather obvious “dynamic” effects of changes in realizations and economic growth. Interestingly, the negative effect on some state tax receipts could be substantial. States like New York and California (and some municipalities, notably New York City) rely heavily on realizations of capital gains, which would drop significantly.

If lawmakers want to increase tax receipts from wealthy individuals, they should lower the top capital-gains rate. Such a step would jump start realizations that even now are somewhat depressed. That’s what happened in 2003, when the rate was reduced to 15%.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

You Might Also Like:

  • Why Bill Gates Wants to Raise Your Taxes
  • Here’s Why Sanders’ Tax Plan Could Usher in a Wave of Tax Avoidance
  • Happy Tax Freedom Day!
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Jeremy Jones, CFA
Jeremy Jones, CFA, CFP® is the Director of Research at Young Research & Publishing Inc., and the Chief Investment Officer at Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. was ranked #5 in CNBC's 2021 Financial Advisor Top 100. Jeremy is also a contributing editor of youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Jeremy Jones, CFA (see all)
  • Are Google, Amazon, and Microsoft About to Crash This Specialized Real Estate Market? - June 29, 2022
  • Regulators’ Bungled Attempts to Cut Emissions Drove Oil Prices Higher - June 28, 2022
  • What Happens to Your Passwords When You Die? - June 27, 2022

Search Young Research

Most Popular

  • Here’s Why You Need a 15-Year Retirement Investment Plan
  • Will the Fed Stick to Its Course?
  • The Power of a Compound Interest Table
  • RECESSION? Dow 25,000, $8 Gas, Rising Interest Rates, Spell Mid-term Crack Up
  • Investing During a Recession
  • Vanguard Wellesley (VWINX) vs. Wellington (VWELX): Which Fund is Best?
  • Why Work When Taxes Take It All?
  • Swiss National Bank Surprises World with Rate Hike
  • Is the Great Job Boom Over?
  • Kellogg Cuts Loose with Split Plan

Don’t Miss

Default Risk Among the Many Concerns with Annuities

Risk and Reward: An Efficient Frontier

How to be a Billionaire: Proven Strategies from the Titans of Wealth

Could this Be the Vanguard GNMA Winning Edge?

Cryptocosm and Life After Google

Warning: Avoid Mutual Fund Year End Distributions

Is Gold a Good Long-term Investment?

How to Invest in Gold

Vanguard Wellington (VWELX): The Original Balanced Fund

What is the Best Gold ETF for Investing and Trading?

Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock: The Only True Dividend King

The Dividend King of the North

You’ll Love This if You’re Dreaming of an Active Retirement Life

RSS The Latest at Richardcyoung.com

  • An Assault on America’s Central Core
  • Hillary Clinton Claws at Relevance by Publicly Insulting Clarence Thomas
  • RURAL RENAISSANCE: America Finds the Country Again
  • The Best Investment Strategy is Simple, Like Analog Music
  • RED WAVE COMING? Americans Fear the Future of Biden’s Economy
  • Biden’s Approval Lower Now than Trump’s Was after January 6, 2021
  • With a Nod from Turkey, Finland and Sweden Speed Toward NATO Membership
  • 10th AMENDMENT: Dobbs Decision a Win for States’ Rights
  • What Just Happened? Fixing Its Historic Mistake
  • Why Work When Taxes Take It All?

About Us

  • About Young Research
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Our Partners

  • Richard C. Young & Co.
  • Richardcyoung.com

Copyright © 2022 | Terms & Conditions

 

Loading Comments...
 

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.