President Donald J. Trump, joined by Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin and Advisor to the President Ivanka Trump, tours the Apple Manufacturing Plant with Apple CEO Tim Cook Wednesday, Nov. 20, 2019, at Flextronics International LTD-Austin Product Introduction Center. (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)
Just because you own an index fund, doesn’t mean your portfolio is properly diversified. Goldman Sachs estimates that only five stocks account for almost 40% of the Russell 1,000 Growth index.
As Bloomberg points out here, if you are an active growth fund manager, the concentration of stocks such as Apple has reached such an extreme level that it has become the only stock that matters for relative performance. Lu Wang reports:
Apple Inc.’s unprecedented market weight creates headaches for stock managers when it rallies: They never own enough of it. That dynamic played out vividly in the third quarter.
Only 27% of large-cap mutual funds beat their benchmarks in the span, the poorest showing for any third quarter since Bank of America Corp. began tracking the data in 1991. While other factors contributed to the dismal performance, strategists including Savita Subramanian highlighted underexposure to Apple as a key culprit.
Shares of the iPhone maker gained 27% in the period, a return that almost tripled the S&P 500 and exceeded all but 33 members in the index. The outsize return, along with its growing market weight as the company’s value topped $2 trillion, created a too high hurdle to clear.
Either by choice or regulatory strictures, not many active funds are positioned to maximize Apple’s gains. Among some 200 equity funds that are benchmarked to the S&P 500 and have at least $500 million in assets, four-fifths held fewer Apple shares than the company’s 6.6% representation in the benchmark, data compiled by Bloomberg show. These funds returned 7.1% over the past three months, trailing the market by 1.3 percentage points.
Missing out was particularly painful for funds whose mandate steers them toward companies with faster profit expansion. Only 20% of growth funds beat their benchmark last quarter, with an underweight Apple ownership detracting 1.5 percentage points from their relative performance, BofA data showed.
Several reasons explain the aversion. Some see the stock as expensive, trading at 30 times forecast earnings. Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook has launched relatively few blockbuster products in the past decade despite forays into areas such as watches and television. Others suggest it may be due to a Securities and Exchange Commission rule limiting a fund’s ownership in a single stock.
Apple, Microsoft Corp. and Amazon.com Inc. are the three most underweight stocks by large-cap growth funds. Many of those managers are subject to SEC diversification rules that limit their very biggest holdings to no more than a quarter of their portfolios, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. strategists led by David Kostin wrote in a note last month.
Interestingly, when Apple’s hegemony eases, fund managers do better. When the shares reversed ground and fell 10% last month, the percentage of fund managers beating their benchmark surged to 60%, BofA data showed. As the economy recovers, market participation is likely to broaden, boding well for stock pickers, according to Subramanian.
Read more here.
