Young Research & Publishing Inc.

Investment Research Since 1978

Disclosure

  • About Us
    • Contributors
    • Archives
    • Dick Young’s Safe America
    • The Final Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
    • Dick Young’s Research Key: Anecdotal Evidence Gathering
    • Crisis at Vanguard
  • Investment Analysis
    • Bonds
    • Currencies and Gold
    • Dividend Investing
    • ETFs & Funds
    • Investment Strategy
    • Retirement Investing
    • Stocks
    • The Efficient Frontier
  • Investment Counsel
  • Retirement Compounders®
  • Free Email Signup

The Illegitimate Tax Mandate

November 12, 2012 By Jeremy Jones, CFA

Following last week’s election, the President and his allies in congress are claiming the outcome of the election (and exit polls) indicates a mandate to raise taxes on the “rich.” Why? Because the President campaigned on a higher tax message. Actually, he campaigned on raising taxes on millionaires and billionaires, not the “thousand-iares” that will see a higher tax bill if he gets his way. But the more dominant message during President Obama’s campaign was not one of higher taxes, but that he isn’t Mitt Romney. If there is any clear mandate from this election, it is not to be Mitt Romney. So congratulations Mr. President, you aren’t Mitt Romney. How that translates into policy is unclear. What is clear is that the President’s claim of a mandate on taxes is dubious.

When you cut through the rhetoric, the President’s message on taxes during the election was a choice between paying higher taxes or asking somebody else to pay higher taxes. Based on exit polls, 60% of Americans said somebody else should pay. That somebody else is the 2% of households that earn more than $250,000 per year.

The results of the exit polls are shocking. Not because the majority of Americans favor higher taxes on the top 2%, but because only 60% of Americans favor such a policy. Ponder the question for a moment. The exit polls are effectively asking 100% of Americans if they would rather see their own taxes go up, or see the taxes of the top 2% go up. The question is obviously flawed. Of course a majority of Americans would rather somebody else foot the bill for profligate government spending. And I am sure that if you asked the bottom half of the top 2% if they would rather see the taxes of the top 1% go up than their own, a majority would favor that policy too.

There is no mandate for higher taxes. The only tax mandate in this election is for somebody else to pay. Maybe we can start taxing the Chinese!

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

You Might Also Like:

  • Since When do Democrats Want to Lower Taxes on the Wealthy?
  • FOMO a Dangerous Investment Strategy
  • Steam Rolled
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Jeremy Jones, CFA
Jeremy Jones, CFA, CFP® is the Director of Research at Young Research & Publishing Inc., and the Chief Investment Officer at Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. CNBC has ranked Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. as one of the Top 100 Financial Advisors in the nation (2019-2022) Disclosure. Jeremy is also a contributing editor of youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Jeremy Jones, CFA (see all)
  • Money Market Assets Hit Record High: $5.4 Trillion - May 26, 2023
  • The Mania in AI Stocks Has Arrived - May 25, 2023
  • The Wisdom of Sam Zell - May 24, 2023

Search Young Research

Most Popular

  • Letter to the Federal Reserve Chairman from Your Survival Guy
  • What Does That Have to Do with Your Dividend?
  • Is an Investment Property Disaster Looming?
  • “I Came from Nothing,” He Said. “I Mean Nothing.”
  • Private Debt Funds: More Risk than Meets the Eye
  • The Wisdom of Sam Zell
  • How Activists Have Weaponized Corporate Boards
  • Is Japan Rising Once More?
  • Vanguard Wellesley (VWINX) vs. Wellington (VWELX): Which Fund is Best?
  • When Did You Become Serious about Your Money?

Don’t Miss

Default Risk Among the Many Concerns with Annuities

Risk and Reward: An Efficient Frontier

How to be a Billionaire: Proven Strategies from the Titans of Wealth

Cryptocosm and Life After Google

Warning: Avoid Mutual Fund Year End Distributions

Is Gold a Good Long-term Investment?

How to Invest in Gold

Vanguard Wellington (VWELX): The Original Balanced Fund

What is the Best Gold ETF for Investing and Trading?

Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock: The Only True Dividend King

The Dividend King of the North

You’ll Love This if You’re Dreaming of an Active Retirement Life

The Importance of a Balanced Portfolio

Invest with Peace of Mind and Comfort

What Kind of Life Are You Investing For?

RSS The Latest at Richardcyoung.com

  • Pushing the Envelope Too Far
  • Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • America’s Favorite Wordsmith Needs Tutoring
  • A Three-Week International Research Trip to Paris via Rome
  • BIOTERROR RISK: The Dangers Genetically Modified Insects
  • Why Be Proud?
  • What Does That Have to Do with Your Dividend?
  • Will Biden’s Ukraine Gambit Be America’s Worst Foreign Policy Disaster?
  • Stossel Says DeSantis Is “Smarter and Better than Biden.”
  • What Would They Give Up for “Equity”?

RSS The Latest at Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Your Survival Guy in Rome 30-Years A.B. (After Babson)
  • Insurers Now Fleeing the Net Zero Insurance Alliance
  • A Three-Week International Research Trip to Paris via Rome
  • Will Biden Repeat Obama with US Debt Downgrade?
  • What Does That Have to Do with Your Dividend?
  • The ESG Cartel
  • Two More States Nearing Passage of Permitless Carry Legislation
  • How Activists Have Weaponized Corporate Boards
  • Letter to the Federal Reserve Chairman from Your Survival Guy
  • Big Blue Blob Cities Get Bad News from Census Report

About Us

  • About Young Research
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Our Partners

  • Richard C. Young & Co.
  • Richardcyoung.com

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.