UBS and other brokers are cheering the idea that the Trump administration may delay or rescind new rules that would have forced the banks to act as fiduciaries for the retirement accounts of their clients. Big brokerages are in the businesses of distributing securities, not advising clients on what’s best for them.
If you are allowing a non-fiduciary to guide your investments, you should understand that they have no legal obligation to have your best interests in mind. If you want conflict-of-interest free guidance, find an advisor such as Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. that, by law, must act in your best interests.
Michael Wursthorn writes for The Wall Street Journal’s, Moneybeat blog that UBS and others are looking forward to the reversal of the Department of Labor’s rule that would have forced them to act as fiduciaries for the retirement accounts they manage.
UBS Group AG is planning for a brokerage landscape unaffected by sweeping new retirement rules set to take effect later this year.
The Swiss bank’s chief financial officer, Kirt Gardner, was the latest executive to say the Trump administration will likely delay or halt the Labor Department’s fiduciary rule requiring brokers to minimize conflicts when giving retirement advice.
“There is some indication that [the rule] will, at a minimum, be delayed, and then potentially, not implemented at all,” Mr. Gardner said to analysts while discussing UBS’s fourth-quarter earnings. UBS’s U.S. brokerage unit, UBS Wealth Management Americas, posted a record fourth-quarter pretax profit as renewed investor confidence pushed revenue higher.
Raymond James Financial Chief Executive Paul Reilly said Thursday he also expected a delay and supported changes to the rule to avoid limiting investors’ access to retirement advice.
Read more here.
Latest posts by E.J. Smith (see all)
- Can Competitors Use Robots to Beat Amazon’s Logistical Dominance? - July 26, 2017
- Can Money Buy Happiness? - July 25, 2017
- Could Vanguard Take its Show on the Road? - July 24, 2017