Young Research & Publishing Inc.

Investment Research Since 1978

Disclosure

  • About Us
    • Contributors
    • Archives
    • Dick Young’s Safe America
    • The Final Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
    • Dick Young’s Research Key: Anecdotal Evidence Gathering
    • Crisis at Vanguard
  • Investment Analysis
    • Bonds
    • Currencies and Gold
    • Dividend Investing
    • ETFs & Funds
    • Investment Strategy
    • Retirement Investing
    • Stocks
    • The Efficient Frontier
  • Investment Counsel
  • Dynamic Maximizers®
  • Retirement Compounders®
  • Free Email Signup

Paul Volcker Explains the Folly of a 2% Inflation Target

October 31, 2018 By Jeremy Jones, CFA

Former Chairman Paul A. Volcker and Former Chairman Alan Greenspan conversing

Writing in Bloomberg, “Tall Paul” Volcker, who as Chairman of the Federal Reserve in the 1980s near singlehandedly tamed America’s rampant inflation, explains why a 2% inflation target is dangerous. He writes:

In 1996, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan had an exchange with Janet Yellen, then a member of the Fed’s Board of Governors, that presaged a major — and, I think, ill-advised — change in the central bank’s approach to managing the economy.

Yellen asked Greenspan: “How do you define price stability?” He gave what I see as the only sensible answer: “That state in which expected changes in the general price level do not effectively alter business or household decisions.” Yellen persisted: “Could you please put a number on that?”

Since then, under the chairmanship of Ben Bernanke and then under Yellen, Alan’s general principle — to me entirely appropriate — has been translated into a number: 2 percent. And more recently, a remarkable consensus has developed among central bankers that there’s a new “red line” for policy: A 2 percent rate of increase in some carefully designed consumer price index is acceptable, even desirable, and at the same time provides a limit.

I puzzle about the rationale. A 2 percent target, or limit, was not in my textbooks years ago. I know of no theoretical justification. It’s difficult to be both a target and a limit at the same time. And a 2 percent inflation rate, successfully maintained, would mean the price level doubles in little more than a generation.

I do know some practical facts. No price index can capture, down to a tenth or a quarter of a percent, the real change in consumer prices. The variety of goods and services, the shifts in demand, the subtle changes in pricing and quality are too complex to calculate precisely from month to month or year to year. Moreover, as an economy grows or slows, there is a tendency for prices to change, a little more up in periods of economic expansion, maybe a little down as the economy slows or recedes, but not sideways year after year.

Yet, as I write, with economic growth rising and the unemployment rate near historic lows, concerns are being voiced that consumer prices are growing too slowly — just because they’re a quarter percent or so below the 2 percent target! Could that be a signal to “ease” monetary policy, or at least to delay restraint, even with the economy at full employment?

Certainly, that would be nonsense. How did central bankers fall into the trap of assigning such weight to tiny changes in a single statistic, with all of its inherent weakness?

Read more here.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

You Might Also Like:

  • The 2% Inflation Fraud
  • Home Price Inflation Heats Up
  • Paul Singer Epically Savages Bitcoin
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Jeremy Jones, CFA
Jeremy Jones, CFA, CFP® is the Director of Research at Young Research & Publishing Inc., and the Chief Investment Officer at Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. was ranked #5 in CNBC's 2021 Financial Advisor Top 100. Jeremy is also a contributing editor of youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Jeremy Jones, CFA (see all)
  • HORDING CASH: Funds Hold the Highest Level of Cash Since 9/11 - May 18, 2022
  • COMMODITY CRUNCH: Will Tesla Buy a Cobalt Mine? - May 17, 2022
  • China’s Economy Taking Hit from Zero-COVID Strategy - May 16, 2022

Search Young Research

Most Popular

  • Don’t Throw Your Bond Portfolio Out the Window
  • MARKET CHAOS: This May Take Time, Here’s How to Prepare
  • You Can Do Better than Mutual Funds and ETFs with Your Cash
  • PRICES SOAR: Diesel Shortage Could Cripple America's Economy
  • Will Market Prices Soon Be Meaningful Again?
  • Vanguard Wellesley (VWINX) vs. Wellington (VWELX): Which Fund is Best?
  • Your Survival Guy: “Sell in May, Buy After Labor Day?”
  • The Power of a Compound Interest Table
  • Junk Bond Yields
  • FAANGS Fall Like a Ton of BRICS

Don’t Miss

Default Risk Among the Many Concerns with Annuities

Risk and Reward: An Efficient Frontier

How to be a Billionaire: Proven Strategies from the Titans of Wealth

Could this Be the Vanguard GNMA Winning Edge?

Cryptocosm and Life After Google

Warning: Avoid Mutual Fund Year End Distributions

Is Gold a Good Long-term Investment?

How to Invest in Gold

Vanguard Wellington (VWELX): The Original Balanced Fund

What is the Best Gold ETF for Investing and Trading?

Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock: The Only True Dividend King

The Dividend King of the North

You’ll Love This if You’re Dreaming of an Active Retirement Life

RSS The Latest at Richardcyoung.com

  • Consequences of Biden Killing the Keystone Pipeline
  • Are You Suffering from One of These Nutrient Deficiencies?
  • PRIMARIES: Trump Endorsed Candidates’ HUGE Night
  • “We Cannot Save Ukraine by Dooming the US Economy.”
  • What’s Ahead for America During Biden’s Last Years
  • BE VIGILANT: The Rats Are Scurrying in These Rough Markets
  • COERCION BY APOCALYPSE: The Great Reset Wants to Transform Society with Disaster
  • More Returnees than Refugees at Ukrainian Border
  • DIGITAL DOLLAR DOOMSDAY: The Wall Street Journal Is NOT Going to Tell You This
  • Musk to Break Silicon Valley’s Progressive Conformity?

About Us

  • About Young Research
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Our Partners

  • Richard C. Young & Co.
  • Richardcyoung.com

Copyright © 2022 | Terms & Conditions

 

Loading Comments...
 

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.