Young Research & Publishing Inc.

Investment Research Since 1978

Disclosure

  • About Us
    • Contributors
    • Archives
    • The Final Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
    • Dick Young’s Research Key: Anecdotal Evidence Gathering
    • Crisis at Vanguard
  • Investment Analysis
    • Bonds
    • Currencies and Gold
    • Dividend Investing
    • ETFs & Funds
    • Investment Strategy
    • Retirement Investing
    • Stocks
    • The Efficient Frontier
  • Investment Counsel
  • Dynamic Maximizers®
  • Retirement Compounders®
  • Free Email Signup
  • Dick Young’s Safe America

The Best Performing Portfolio

October 25, 2017 By Jeremy Jones, CFA

Pop Quiz! Which of these portfolios had the best performance over the last three years?

3yr Return

A) Portfolio 1 +65.8%

B) Portfolio 2 +56.5%

C) Portfolio 3 +42.5%

D) Not enough information

Easy, right? The answer is obviously Portfolio 1 because it had the highest return.

That’s at least how the vast majority of the investing public and many in the financial press would have answered the question, but it’s incorrect. Investment return is not the same as investment performance.

To properly evaluate investment performance you must consider risk as well as return. The correct answer to my quiz is D, because I did not provide any risk metrics.

The portfolio with the lowest return, (Portfolio 3) had the best performance. Why? Because Portfolio 3 has the lowest risk.

Risk comes in many different varieties. There is business risk, financial risk, liquidity risk, political risk, currency risk, and so on and so forth.

There is no single quantitative measure of risk that can summarize all of the risks an investor takes, but one metric that investors often use to gauge the riskiness of a portfolio is beta. Beta is a measure of volatility. A portfolio with a beta of 1.5 should be expected to rise by 15% if the market is up 10% and to fall by 15% when the market is down by 10%. Conversely a portfolio with a beta of 0.50 should be expected to rise by 5% when the market is up 10% and to fall by 5% when the market is down by 10%.

Okay then. Let me lift the veil on the three portfolios in my quiz. Portfolio 1 is the Fidelity NASDAQ Composite ETF, Portfolio 2 is the S&P 500 (the market), and Portfolio 3 is the SPDR Utilities ETF.

The SPDR Utilities ETF has a beta of .53 and a return of 42.5%. The S&P 500 (the market in our measure of beta) has by definition a beta of 1. The Nasdaq ETF has a beta of 1.1.

Based on the .53 beta of the SDPR Utilities fund and the 56.5% return of the S&P 500, the SPDR Utilities ETF should be up about 30%. The actual return of SPDR Utilities is 42.5% – a difference of 12.5%.

Now let’s look at the Nasdaq ETF, the portfolio with the highest return in the bunch. The Nasdaq fund has a beta of 1.1, putting its expected return at about 62% (56.5%*1.1). The Actual return of the NASDAQ ETF is 67.3%–a difference of 5.2%.

So although the NASDAQ ETF delivered a greater return, it did so by taking more risk. The SPDR Utilities fund with a return that is 12.5% more than would have been expected based on its beta is the best performing fund in the group.

Why did I drag you through a full-on-nerd explanation of beta and risk?

I want to help arm you with the intelligence necessary to avoid the emotionally charged investment decisions that wreak havoc on many investors’ portfolios. Decisions I see too many investors making today.

If you have a conservative portfolio that has lagged the market in recent years, you may be feeling tempted to make up for lost time. Tempted to buy the stocks that have performed the best recently. Before you make any rash decisions, be sure you have both the ability and the willingness to take on the additional risk that will be required to make such a move. Remember, risk is a two way street. On the way up, more risk sounds like an exceptional idea, but on the way down, higher risk strategies often cause great emotional hardship. Hardship that pushes some to bail out near the bottom, only to get back in after much of the losses have been recovered.

The best path to personal investment prosperity is to first take only as much risk as you are willing and able to take and then, and only then, to worry about return.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

You Might Also Like:

  • Portfolio Strategy: Looking Past the End of the Bull
  • The Power of Diversification
  • Portfolio Strategy: Watch the Divergences
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Jeremy Jones, CFA
Jeremy Jones, CFA, CFP® is the Director of Research at Young Research & Publishing Inc., and the Chief Investment Officer at Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. was ranked #10 in CNBC's 2019 Financial Advisor Top 100. Jeremy is also a contributing editor of youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Jeremy Jones, CFA (see all)
  • Corporations Rush to Reap Equity Windfall - January 22, 2021
  • Investors Are Being Conditioned Not To Recognise the Danger - January 21, 2021
  • What Is the Stock Market’s Link to the Economy? - January 20, 2021

Search Young Research

Most Popular

  • The Fed is Sacrificing Retirees to Save the Banks
  • Dick Young’s Safe America: Chapter 1, Part I
  • I’ve Been in Richard Young’s Maximizers for Years
  • Vanguard Wellesley (VWINX) vs. Wellington (VWELX): Which Fund is Best?
  • The Power of a Compound Interest Table
  • Whether Through Audacity or Ignorance, Stock Fundamentals Are Being Ignored
  • Jim Simons's Renaissance Technologies vs. Internet Forum Traders
  • The Highest Yielding S&P 500 Stocks
  • Smith Family Robinson in Live Free or Die, NH
  • February RAGE Gauge: Americans Focusing on What's In Front of Them

Don’t Miss

Default Risk Among the Many Concerns with Annuities

Risk and Reward: An Efficient Frontier

How to be a Billionaire: Proven Strategies from the Titans of Wealth

Could this Be the Vanguard GNMA Winning Edge?

Cryptocosm and Life After Google

Warning: Avoid Mutual Fund Year End Distributions

Is Gold a Good Long-term Investment?

How to Invest in Gold

Vanguard Wellington (VWELX): The Original Balanced Fund

What is the Best Gold ETF for Investing and Trading?

Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock: The Only True Dividend King

The Dividend King of the North

You’ll Love This if You’re Dreaming of an Active Retirement Life

RSS The Latest at Richardcyoung.com

  • Absentee Ballots Not Verified
  • SARS-CoV-2: Probability of Outdoor Airborne Transmission Very Low
  • Your Personal Safety: Concealed-Carry How to Carry Your Freedom
  • Mostly Peaceful, Ungovernable Protestors
  • Biden’s Inaugural, the Most Confusing, Contradictory, Incoherent Ever?
  • Ten Republican Senators to Get Behind
  • Why Do Government Officials Want To Silence Their Opponents?
  • And 2022 Is Right Around the Corner
  • PANDEMIC Pushes Military-Grade Surveillance on Americans Like YOU
  • Facebook Is Already Censoring This Letter

About Us

  • About Young Research
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Our Partners

  • Richard C. Young & Co.
  • Richardcyoung.com

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Pinterest

Copyright © 2021 | Terms & Conditions

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.