Young Research & Publishing Inc.

Investment Research Since 1978

Compensation was paid to utilize rankings. Click here to read full disclosure.

  • About Us
    • Contributors
    • Archives
    • Dick Young’s Safe America
    • The Final Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
    • Dick Young’s Research Key: Anecdotal Evidence Gathering
    • Crisis at Vanguard
  • Investment Analysis
    • Bonds
    • Currencies and Gold
    • Dividend Investing
    • ETFs & Funds
    • Investment Strategy
    • Retirement Investing
    • Stocks
    • The Efficient Frontier
  • Investment Counsel
  • Retirement Compounders®
  • Free Email Signup

The Dangers of a Federal Reserve Digital Currency

April 27, 2022 By E.J. Smith

By enzozo @ Shutterstock.com

At the Cato Institute, Norbert Michel explains how central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are about control. He writes about the dangers of such a creation:

Life Comes at You Fast. Slow It Down with My Friday Email. It’s Free.

As a starting point, I want to distinguish between a wholesale CBDC and retail CBDC.

With a wholesale CBDC, banks can electronically transact with each other using a liability of the central bank. Because that is essentially what banks do now, transact and settle (electronically) using reserve accounts held at the Fed, there aren’t very many new and interesting wholesale CBDC policy issues. (Basically, the Fed has had a wholesale CBDC for decades.)

While Americans have long held money predominantly in digital form—for example in bank accounts recorded as computer entries on commercial bank ledgers—a CBDC would differ from existing digital money available to the general public because a CBDC would be a liability of the Federal Reserve, not of a commercial bank.

This feature–making electronic transactions using a liability of the Federal Reserve–is central to why Congress should make sure that the Fed never issues a retail CBDC. The problem is that the federal government, not privately owned commercial banks, would be responsible for issuing deposits. And while this fact might seem like a feature instead of bug, it’s a major problem for anything that resembles a free society. (Paper currency is also a liability of the Fed, but that fact means very little with freely circulating fiat money, especially when private banks issue deposits.)

Some CBDC supporters argue that privately issued money can coexist with a CBDC, but this view is extremely short‐​sighted. Even most central banks fear that providing accounts directly to consumers risks disintermediating the financial system, a fear that surely helps explain Jay Powell’s public stance on retail CBDCs. It also helps explain the Fed’s fascination with an “intermediated” CBDC, whereby private banks have the privilege of servicing the consumers’ needs even though the liability remains with the central bank. Ultimately that system is no better. (At best, it would slow the disintermediation while entrenching a group of privileged firms).

Regardless, the two forms of money cannot peacefully coexist unless the government hands out special privileges or subsidies. The two electronic mediums would be near perfect substitutes, and the main difference for consumers and merchants is that the Fed’s version would automatically come with zero credit or liquidity risk. Private firms can’t compete on that dimension, and they (unlike the Fed) have to recover their costs to stay in business.

The Fed’s report even acknowledges this high degree of substitutability:

Banks currently rely (in large part) on deposits to fund their loans. A widely available CBDC would serve as a close—or, in the case of an interest‐​bearing CBDC, near-perfect—substitute for commercial bank money.

The only problem with this statement is that it says nothing about the degree of substitution between a non-interest bearing CBDC and commercial bank money. Commercial bank money that serves as a medium of exchange generally earns little to no interest, so even a non‐​interest‐​bearing CBDC is a near‐​perfect substitute for commercial bank money.

Still, the interest‐​bearing version is particularly relevant to the policy discussion.

The Fed’s current operating framework depends on paying interest to banks for their reserves. No version of reality exists without political pressure for the Fed to pay individual CBDC holders at least the same rate of interest as it pays banks on reserves, and even that level of payment increases the risk of disintermediation.

Similarly, the political pressure will always be to expand the pool of people using the CBDC. While CBDC proponents currently speak of helping only the “unbanked” and the “underserved,” there is absolutely no chance that those groups won’t soon be more broadly defined. (Apparently, there’s also no chance that CBDC proponents will acknowledge that broader economic problems, not a lack of digital money, keep these folks out of the banking system. But that’s another column.)

And the political reality is that CBDC advocates want to use public funds to provide something (money) at a lower cost than the private sector. Setting aside the incredibly rich irony that government rules and regulations are a primary driver of that cost in the first place, as well as the fiction that the government providing something means the cost is actually lower, this policy equates money with a public good. That is, CBDC advocates do not care if the private banking system is completely disintermediated–they want the government to provide money.

But money itself is not a public good. The fact that its production has been increasingly encroached upon by the government is irrelevant. And the fact that something called a CBDC even exists is only due to payment innovations that occurred in the private market. The CBDC itself is mainly the government’s attempt to protect its privileged position and exert more control over money.

The problem is that there is no limit to the level of control that the government could exert over people if money is purely electronic and provided directly by the government. A CBDC would give federal officials full control over the money going into–and coming out of–every person’s account.

Action Line: Americans don’t want or need the Fed to have more control over their money. They really just want the government out of their way so they can run their businesses and take care of their families. If you’re tired of the government and the Fed getting further and further into your affairs, stick with me.

Originally posted on Your Survival Guy. 

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

You Might Also Like:

  • DIGITAL DANGERS: Does America Need a Digital Dollar?
  • Digital Currencies Would Stifle Economic Freedom
  • Summers: A Woke Federal Reserve Won’t Save America from Inflation
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
E.J. Smith
E.J. Smith is Founder of YourSurvivalGuy.com, Managing Director at Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd., a Managing Editor of Richardcyoung.com, and Editor-in-Chief of Youngresearch.com. His focus at all times is on preparing clients and readers for “Times Like These.” E.J. graduated from Babson College in Wellesley, Massachusetts, with a B.S. in finance and investments. In 1995, E.J. began his investment career at Fidelity Investments in Boston before joining Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. in 1998. E.J. has trained at Sig Sauer Academy in Epping, NH. His first drum set was a 5-piece Slingerland with Zildjians. He grew-up worshiping Neil Peart (RIP) of the band Rush, and loves the song Tom Sawyer—the name of his family’s boat, a Grady-White Canyon 306. He grew up in Mattapoisett, MA, an idyllic small town on the water near Cape Cod. He spends time in Newport, RI and Bartlett, NH—both as far away from Wall Street as one could mentally get. The Newport office is on a quiet, tree lined street not far from the harbor and the log cabin in Bartlett, NH, the “Live Free or Die” state, sits on the edge of the White Mountain National Forest. He enjoys spending time in Key West (RIP JB) and Paris.

Please get in touch with E.J. at ejsmith@youngresearch.com

Click here to sign up for my free monthly Survive & Thrive letter.
Latest posts by E.J. Smith (see all)
  • “Then One Day the Grandfather was Gone” - September 28, 2023
  • “No Way I’m Spending That Much on Those” - September 27, 2023
  • “You Didn’t Eat That Again, Did You?” - September 26, 2023

Search Young Research

Most Popular

  • Wellington and Wellesley Funds Not Managed by Vanguard
  • The Single Worst Market Timing Event in History
  • “No Way I’m Spending That Much on Those”
  • Should America Move Closer to the Saudis, or Push them Away?
  • The War Machine's Manpower Problem
  • The Power of a Compound Interest Table
  • Will the Fed Hold Up Its End of the Bargain?
  • “You Didn’t Eat That Again, Did You?”
  • Vanguard Wellesley (VWINX) vs. Wellington (VWELX): Which Fund is Best?
  • Profits Becoming Elusive in China

Don’t Miss

Default Risk Among the Many Concerns with Annuities

Risk and Reward: An Efficient Frontier

How to be a Billionaire: Proven Strategies from the Titans of Wealth

Cryptocosm and Life After Google

Warning: Avoid Mutual Fund Year End Distributions

Is Gold a Good Long-term Investment?

How to Invest in Gold

Vanguard Wellington (VWELX): The Original Balanced Fund

What is the Best Gold ETF for Investing and Trading?

Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock: The Only True Dividend King

The Dividend King of the North

You’ll Love This if You’re Dreaming of an Active Retirement Life

The Importance of a Balanced Portfolio

Invest with Peace of Mind and Comfort

What Kind of Life Are You Investing For?

RSS The Latest at Richardcyoung.com

  • The Elephant in the Room
  • “Then One Day the Grandfather was Gone”
  • My Key West Garden Office
  • OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD: The Truth About the CIA?
  • Does a New Antiviral Covid Drug Do More Harm than Good?
  • The Biden Regime Treats Americans Worse than Illegal Immigrants
  • Key West #1 Wine Shop & Wine Expert
  • California – First to Enact Statewide Gun and Ammo Tax
  • “No Way I’m Spending That Much on Those”
  • How Much Can Grid Battery Storage Help?

RSS The Latest at Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • “Then One Day the Grandfather was Gone”
  • How Joe Biden Raised Oil Prices
  • Is the Philadelphia Looting Spree the Wake-up Call America Needs?
  • “No Way I’m Spending That Much on Those”
  • What Trade Policy Serves America’s National Interest Best?
  • California Wants to Make the 2nd Amendment Unaffordable
  • “You Didn’t Eat That Again, Did You?”
  • Is McCarthy Up to the Task?
  • Rising Costs Are Hammering Commercial Real Estate
  • Your Survival Guy Fishing with Dolphins

About Us

  • About Young Research
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Our Partners

  • Richard C. Young & Co.
  • Richardcyoung.com

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions

 

Loading Comments...
 

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.