Young Research & Publishing Inc.

Investment Research Since 1978

Disclosure

  • About Us
    • Contributors
    • Archives
    • Dick Young’s Safe America
    • The Final Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
    • Dick Young’s Research Key: Anecdotal Evidence Gathering
    • Crisis at Vanguard
  • Investment Analysis
    • Bonds
    • Currencies and Gold
    • Dividend Investing
    • ETFs & Funds
    • Investment Strategy
    • Retirement Investing
    • Stocks
    • The Efficient Frontier
  • Investment Counsel
  • Retirement Compounders®
  • Free Email Signup

Institutional Investors “Lulled Into Complacency” by VC “Phoney Happiness”

January 3, 2023 By Jeremy Jones, CFA

By Moor Studio @ Shutterstock.com

Through a comparison of venture capital to Kathie Wood’s Ark Innovation ETF, Daniel Rasmussen, suggests in the Financial Times that institutional investors are “lured by promises of higher returns and lower volatility,” but are “lulled into complacency, paying an illiquidity premium for the “phoney happiness” of private marks.” He writes:

Consider an institutional investor looking to add growth/tech exposure at the start of 2020. They could choose between allocating to Cathie Wood’s Ark Innovation exchange traded fund or to a VC fund. The ETF was on a great run, beating both the Nasdaq and VC indices by about 15 per cent annually over the previous three years.

But, other than the State of Wisconsin Investment Board, endowments, foundations and pensions do not appear on the list of top 100 investors in the ETF, according to Capital IQ. In fact, scepticism about Ark was so widespread that Tuttle Capital launched an ETF (SARK) explicitly designed for investors who wanted to short Ark.

But despite the doubts about Ark, which had handily outperformed the venture index during the bull market, institutional investors dumped money into VC funds. In 2021 and 2022, investors allocated an unprecedented $270bn to US VC, according to Preqin. Back in 2014-17 there was only $30bn-40bn of VC capital raised per year.

Hating Ark and loving venture capital seems intellectually inconsistent. The underlying companies are similar.

The valuations of innovative companies should be comparable across both the private and public markets. And Ark was dramatically outperforming venture in the good years. But it presented a problem that venture does not: true mark-to-market volatility on small and unprofitable companies’ equity.

While most institutional VC managers acknowledge the smoothing effect and make internal adjustments, we think the reported marks are what truly drives decision making.

Just think: if an institution told you they had 15 per cent of their portfolio in Ark, you might question the degree of the bet. But many institutions have well over that allocation to venture capital.

The average buyout and VC allocations for a university with a $1bn endowment were 16.6 per cent and 13.4 per cent, respectively, at the end of June last year, according to data from the US National Association of College and University Business Officers. Some investment consultants recommend that clients should take private allocations (which also include private real estate and other private assets) higher than 40 per cent, arguing that institutions with higher allocations to privates do better in market downturns.

Institutions have fallen in love with private markets, lured by promises of higher returns and lower volatility. Allocations to VC have soared along with allocations to private equity, private real estate and private credit.

But perhaps these investors have been lulled into complacency, paying an illiquidity premium for the “phoney happiness” of private marks. By doing so — instead of receiving a premium as economic theory suggests — there is bound to be a drag on returns.

As research from Harvard economist Andrei Shleifer has shown, there are three ingredients to a financial crisis: consensus optimism, leverage and illiquidity. And private markets exhibit all three characteristics. Illiquidity may be fine on the way up, but, as investors in the Blackstone Real Estate Income Trust are discovering, it’s not ideal when market conditions change. Blackstone limited withdrawals from its $125bn real estate investment fund last month following a surge in redemptions.

And after the dotcom bubble bursting, it took all the way until the end of 2014 for the VC index to regain the high water mark it set in early 2000. If the current listed equity market downturn persists, marks will eventually converge nearer to reality, leaving institutions nursing very real and illiquid losses.

Read more here.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

You Might Also Like:

  • Institutional Investors Fall in Love with Oil, Again
  • CRYPTO CHARLATANS: Investors Lulled to Sleep by Celebrities, Influencers
  • Skittish Investors Flock to Silver
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Jeremy Jones, CFA
Jeremy Jones, CFA, CFP® is the Director of Research at Young Research & Publishing Inc., and the Chief Investment Officer at Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. CNBC has ranked Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. as one of the Top 100 Financial Advisors in the nation (2019-2022) Disclosure. Jeremy is also a contributing editor of youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Jeremy Jones, CFA (see all)
  • Who’s to Blame for Banking Vulnerability? - March 17, 2023
  • Mortgage Market Not Expected to Settle Down Soon - March 17, 2023
  • Were Silicon Valley Bank’s Motivations for Taking Losses Pure? - March 16, 2023

Search Young Research

Most Popular

  • Silicon Valley Bank: What Do Investors Expect?
  • What’s Going On with Banks and Are My Deposits Safe?
  • Will the Black Swan Usher in Digital Dollars?
  • The Education of Barney Frank
  • “Will We Have Enough to Live On Forever?”
  • Vanguard Wellesley (VWINX) vs. Wellington (VWELX): Which Fund is Best?
  • Credit Suisse Announced "Material Weaknesses" In Its Internal Controls
  • Is Deposit Insurance a Solution or a Problem?
  • Major Rail Merger Gets Approval
  • What Does Inflation Mean to You?

Don’t Miss

Default Risk Among the Many Concerns with Annuities

Risk and Reward: An Efficient Frontier

How to be a Billionaire: Proven Strategies from the Titans of Wealth

Cryptocosm and Life After Google

Warning: Avoid Mutual Fund Year End Distributions

Is Gold a Good Long-term Investment?

How to Invest in Gold

Vanguard Wellington (VWELX): The Original Balanced Fund

What is the Best Gold ETF for Investing and Trading?

Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock: The Only True Dividend King

The Dividend King of the North

You’ll Love This if You’re Dreaming of an Active Retirement Life

The Importance of a Balanced Portfolio

Invest with Peace of Mind and Comfort

What Kind of Life Are You Investing For?

RSS The Latest at Richardcyoung.com

  • Pushing Back at ESG
  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • Greetings from Key West
  • Cheap Reliable Heating – a Life Saver
  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • Are You Prepared to Run Out of Water?
  • Biden Has Lost Control of the Northern Border Too
  • Is Plant-Based Meat Unhealthy and Harmful to the Environment?
  • ESG, By-Pass the Ballot Box
  • Are You Living Your Best Life?

RSS The Latest at Yoursurvivalguy.com

  • Your Survival Guy’s BEST Insider’s Guide to Key West
  • Be Wary of Those Who Wrap Themselves in Capes
  • For Whom Is Your Portfolio Serving?
  • ESG: Are Markets Ready for “A Needed Dose of Reality?”
  • Was Silicon Valley Bank a Victim of ESG?
  • Are You Living Your Best Life?
  • March RAGE Gauge: Will the Black Swan Usher in Digital Dollars?
  • Gretchen Whitmer Reviving Forced Unionization in Michigan
  • Will the Black Swan Usher in Digital Dollars?
  • How the Rich Get Richer: You Invest, They Win

About Us

  • About Young Research
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Our Partners

  • Richard C. Young & Co.
  • Richardcyoung.com

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions

 

Loading Comments...
 

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.