Young Research & Publishing Inc.

Investment Research Since 1978

Disclosure

  • About Us
    • Contributors
    • Archives
    • The Final Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
    • Dick Young’s Research Key: Anecdotal Evidence Gathering
    • Crisis at Vanguard
  • Investment Analysis
    • Bonds
    • Currencies and Gold
    • Dividend Investing
    • ETFs & Funds
    • Investment Strategy
    • Retirement Investing
    • Stocks
    • The Efficient Frontier
  • Investment Counsel
  • Dynamic Maximizers®
  • Retirement Compounders®
  • Free Email Signup
  • Dick Young’s Safe America

Falling Short on Retirement: Should You Save More or Work Longer?

March 28, 2018 By Jeremy Jones, CFA

By Atomazul @ Shutterstock.com

The WSJ reports today on a new paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research illustrating the trade-off between working longer and saving more. NBER finds that delaying retirement and social security by just three to six months has the same impact on retirement income as saving 1% of your salary for 30 years. Sounds powerful.

A couple of words of caution on the results though. Most of the benefit from working longer comes from higher social security payments. For each year you delay social security passed your full retirement age, your social security benefit can rise as much as 8%.

If social security is a minor part of your retirement income plan, saving may still be your best route. It is also not advisable to assume that you can afford to save less because you can just work longer. What if you get injured and can’t continue to work? What if you decide at 65 that you are done dealing with the stress of a full-time job? What if social security benefits change?

Lots of uncertainty. The better plan is to save more today and plan on working longer.

If, like many people, you think your retirement savings aren’t on track, which do you think can have the most impact: saving more of your income or working a bit longer?

Setting aside a significant portion of your income is obviously a sound approach for building a nest egg, especially if you start saving early on. But working a little longer—an extra couple of years or even a few extra months—can have as big a payoff as saving substantially more, according to a new study.

A working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research seeks to illustrate the trade-off between working longer and saving more. It finds that delaying retirement and Social Security payouts by just three to six months has the same impact on retirement income as saving 1% of your salary a year for 30 years.

“If you are approaching retirement and worried that you haven’t saved enough, our paper suggests that there is still hope,” says Sita Nataraj Slavov, a professor at George Mason University’s Schar School of Policy and Government and one of the authors of the paper.

Read more here.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

You Might Also Like:

  • Where to Live to Save for Retirement. It’s Not Where You Think
  • Will You Run Out of Money in Retirement?
  • Top 10 “Retirement Killers”
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Jeremy Jones, CFA
Jeremy Jones, CFA, CFP® is the Director of Research at Young Research & Publishing Inc., and the Chief Investment Officer at Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. was ranked #10 in CNBC's 2019 Financial Advisor Top 100. Jeremy is also a contributing editor of youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Jeremy Jones, CFA (see all)
  • The Parallels Between Today’s Stock Market and the Dot-Com Bubble - January 25, 2021
  • Corporations Rush to Reap Equity Windfall - January 22, 2021
  • Investors Are Being Conditioned Not To Recognise the Danger - January 21, 2021

Search Young Research

Most Popular

  • The Fed is Sacrificing Retirees to Save the Banks
  • Dick Young’s Safe America: Chapter 1, Part I
  • I’ve Been in Richard Young’s Maximizers for Years
  • Vanguard Wellesley (VWINX) vs. Wellington (VWELX): Which Fund is Best?
  • The Highest Yielding S&P 500 Stocks
  • The Power of a Compound Interest Table
  • Whether Through Audacity or Ignorance, Stock Fundamentals Are Being Ignored
  • Jim Simons's Renaissance Technologies vs. Internet Forum Traders
  • Smith Family Robinson in Live Free or Die, NH
  • February RAGE Gauge: Americans Focusing on What's In Front of Them

Don’t Miss

Default Risk Among the Many Concerns with Annuities

Risk and Reward: An Efficient Frontier

How to be a Billionaire: Proven Strategies from the Titans of Wealth

Could this Be the Vanguard GNMA Winning Edge?

Cryptocosm and Life After Google

Warning: Avoid Mutual Fund Year End Distributions

Is Gold a Good Long-term Investment?

How to Invest in Gold

Vanguard Wellington (VWELX): The Original Balanced Fund

What is the Best Gold ETF for Investing and Trading?

Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock: The Only True Dividend King

The Dividend King of the North

You’ll Love This if You’re Dreaming of an Active Retirement Life

RSS The Latest at Richardcyoung.com

  • The Fundamental Disconnect of “Unity” and the Progressive Left
  • Unmasking Heath and Human Services Secretary Nominee Xavier Becerra
  • Absentee Ballots Not Verified
  • SARS-CoV-2: Probability of Outdoor Airborne Transmission Very Low
  • Your Personal Safety: Concealed-Carry How to Carry Your Freedom
  • Mostly Peaceful, Ungovernable Protestors
  • Biden’s Inaugural, the Most Confusing, Contradictory, Incoherent Ever?
  • Is the GOP Over? Not Even Close: Here’s Why
  • Impeaching an Ex-President is Unconstitutional
  • Ten Republican Senators to Get Behind

About Us

  • About Young Research
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Our Partners

  • Richard C. Young & Co.
  • Richardcyoung.com

Social Media

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Pinterest

Copyright © 2021 | Terms & Conditions

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.