Young Research & Publishing Inc.

Investment Research Since 1978

Disclosure

  • About Us
    • Contributors
    • Archives
    • Dick Young’s Safe America
    • The Final Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
    • Dick Young’s Research Key: Anecdotal Evidence Gathering
    • Crisis at Vanguard
  • Investment Analysis
    • Bonds
    • Currencies and Gold
    • Dividend Investing
    • ETFs & Funds
    • Investment Strategy
    • Retirement Investing
    • Stocks
    • The Efficient Frontier
  • Investment Counsel
  • Dynamic Maximizers®
  • Retirement Compounders®
  • Free Email Signup

Did China Just Outmaneuver Trump on Trade?

May 21, 2018 By Jeremy Jones, CFA

President Donald J. Trump and President Xi Jinping | July 8, 2017 (Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

The Trump administration has decided not to impose $150 billion in tariffs on China. According to the FT, the Trump administration caved on its demands for China to stop subsidizing favored industries and engaging in other troublesome behavior so long as China buys more American goods. This is a rather disappointing end to the tough-on-China trade policy. The U.S. says it will consider putting tariffs back on the table if China doesn’t live up to its commitments. But who is kidding who here?

It would seem China has outmaneuvered Trump. Trump’s presidency ends in two years, or six years if he’s lucky. What is to stop China from doing as little as possible and running out the clock on the Trump administration? Chances are the next president won’t be bold enough to threaten unilateral tariffs on China.

What is most disturbing about this deal is that the U.S. apparently has industry by industry targets in mind for China’s purchases. Is the U.S. now playing China’s game by favoring certain industries over others?

Critics in the US are also concerned that its main emphasis appears to be on meeting Mr Trump’s goal of reducing the US’s annual $337bn trade deficit with China rather than tackling more difficult structural issues in the Chinese economy, such as Beijing’s subsidisation of key industries and systemic theft of US intellectual property.

Mr Mnuchin insisted on Sunday that Chinese commitments to addressing such issues were part of the broader deal and warned that Mr Trump would be free to impose tariffs if Beijing did not live up to its commitments.

He said the two sides had made “meaningful progress”, adding: “We have agreed to put the tariffs on hold while we try to execute the framework.”

But he and other advocates within the administration of reaching a quick deal with Beijing face scepticism from a US business community that sees those structural issues as a more important endeavour than reducing the trade deficit.

Read more here.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

You Might Also Like:

  • Trump: $100 Billion More in China Tariffs?
  • Kudlow: Blame China, Not Trump
  • What Will Happen if Trump Increases Tariffs on China?
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Jeremy Jones, CFA
Jeremy Jones, CFA, CFP® is the Director of Research at Young Research & Publishing Inc., and the Chief Investment Officer at Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. was ranked #5 in CNBC's 2021 Financial Advisor Top 100. Jeremy is also a contributing editor of youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Jeremy Jones, CFA (see all)
  • China Builds an Anti-Quad Coalition - May 27, 2022
  • There Are Tech Companies “Still Dreaming of Boundless Growth” - May 26, 2022
  • How Can the Fed Prevent Stagflation? - May 25, 2022

Search Young Research

Most Popular

  • MARKET TURNING: Canada's Housing Market Turmoil
  • BUY THE DIPS? Can You Catch a Ginsu Knife?
  • Watch Out for Your Worst Enemy
  • How Can the Fed Prevent Stagflation?
  • Job Market Survival Advice for Graduates and for Those YOU Love
  • Now You Can Own Your Vacation and It Doesn’t Have to Be a Time Share
  • BULLWHIPPED? Inventory Overhang Could Slow Growth in Certain Sectors
  • The Power of a Compound Interest Table
  • Big Banks Adopting Blockchain for Short-Term Trading
  • Vanguard Wellesley (VWINX) vs. Wellington (VWELX): Which Fund is Best?

Don’t Miss

Default Risk Among the Many Concerns with Annuities

Risk and Reward: An Efficient Frontier

How to be a Billionaire: Proven Strategies from the Titans of Wealth

Could this Be the Vanguard GNMA Winning Edge?

Cryptocosm and Life After Google

Warning: Avoid Mutual Fund Year End Distributions

Is Gold a Good Long-term Investment?

How to Invest in Gold

Vanguard Wellington (VWELX): The Original Balanced Fund

What is the Best Gold ETF for Investing and Trading?

Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock: The Only True Dividend King

The Dividend King of the North

You’ll Love This if You’re Dreaming of an Active Retirement Life

RSS The Latest at Richardcyoung.com

  • KRISTALLNACHT: How Well Intentioned Gun Registries Become Tools of Evil
  • Your Survival Guy: “Life on Main Street Hasn’t Been This Hard in a While”
  • Is America About to Lose Its Investments in Colombia?
  • POWER MOVE? Did Viktor Orban Just Seize Control of Hungary?
  • Americans Are Abandoning ESPN and Woke Professional Sports Leagues
  • If You Have a Plan, I Believe You’ll Get to Where You Want to Go
  • President Joe Biden’s Good Question
  • Georgia Proves All Politics Are Local
  • VIDEO: DeSantis: America “Cannot Have a Ministry of Truth”
  • Can America Cut It’s Spending in Half? YES! It’s Been Done Before

About Us

  • About Young Research
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Our Partners

  • Richard C. Young & Co.
  • Richardcyoung.com

Copyright © 2022 | Terms & Conditions

 

Loading Comments...
 

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.