When a bank gets too big, it’s the customer who usually pays the price. Look no further than Wells Fargo:
As Wells Fargo & Co.’s sales-tactics scandal unfolded, investors, regulators and politicians asked how improper practices could have persisted for so long. One possible reason: bank branches were given a heads up before Wells Fargo’s internal monitors landed for inspections.
Managers and employees at the bank’s roughly 6,000 branches across the U.S. typically had at least 24 hours’ warning about annual reviews conducted by risk employees, current and former Wells Fargo employees and executives said. That gave many employees time to cover up improper practices, such as opening accounts or signing customers up for products without their knowledge.
More than a dozen current and former employees of the bank across California, Arizona and New Jersey, for instance, said they forged or saw colleagues forge signatures on documents or shred papers that could have indicated accounts were opened without authorization.
Read more here.
Latest posts by E.J. Smith (see all)
- A Risky Addition to an Otherwise Decent Dodd-Frank Reform: Part II - May 25, 2018
- A Risky Addition to an Otherwise Decent Dodd-Frank Reform - May 24, 2018
- A Warning for the Global Economy - May 23, 2018