Young Research & Publishing Inc.

Investment Research Since 1978

Disclosure

  • About Us
    • Contributors
    • Archives
    • Dick Young’s Safe America
    • The Final Richard C. Young’s Intelligence Report
    • You’ve Read The Last Issue of Intelligence Report, Now What?
    • Dick Young’s Research Key: Anecdotal Evidence Gathering
    • Crisis at Vanguard
  • Investment Analysis
    • Bonds
    • Currencies and Gold
    • Dividend Investing
    • ETFs & Funds
    • Investment Strategy
    • Retirement Investing
    • Stocks
    • The Efficient Frontier
  • Investment Counsel
  • Dynamic Maximizers®
  • Retirement Compounders®
  • Free Email Signup

Landmark E-Commerce Decision by the Supreme Court

June 21, 2018 By Jeremy Jones, CFA

Finished and occupied in 1935, the design of the Supreme Court draws upon the classical Roman temple form, making it a definitive example of neoclassical architecture.

Today the Supreme Court has decided states are allowed to collect taxes from online retailers. Ten states already have laws requiring out of state sellers to notify buyers of taxes owed and to inform states of unpaid sales taxes. Retailers opposed the laws on the grounds that they had no presence in the states where taxes were being levied.

In a 1992 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that companies with no physical presence in a state didn’t need to collect that state’s sales taxes. But now that online sales account for 10% of shopping, the old rule doesn’t work anymore.

The change in Supreme Court precedent should benefit smaller local businesses by creating a level playing field. Large online retailers are already collecting taxes on most purchases, but some of their smaller affiliates are not, so offers through popular portals may see higher prices at checkout.

USA Today’s Richard Wolf reports:

The decision, which overturns an earlier Supreme Court precedent, will boost state revenues at the expense of consumers and sellers who have avoided sales taxes in the past.

Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the 5-4 decision, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch. Chief Justice John Roberts dissented, saying the decision should be left to Congress, and was joined by Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

The high court ruled in 1967 and again in 1992 that companies without a physical presence in a state did not have to collect sales taxes. But those rulings applied mostly to mail-order catalog companies. In 1992, Amazon had not yet begun selling books out of Jeff Bezos’ garage.

In its challenge, South Dakota noted that “times have changed,” with online sales growing at four times the rate of total retail sales. As a result, state and local governments in 45 states lose billions of dollars annually in taxes. (Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire and Oregon do not have sales taxes.)

In response, online sellers Wayfair, Overstock.com and Newegg, said online retailers could face some 12,000 local tax jurisdictions if the Supreme Court sided with the states. They warned of economic chaos — at least until Congress steps in,

When the court ruled in 1967 and 1992 that Illinois and North Dakota could not squeeze sales taxes from sellers with no presence in those states, there wasn’t nearly as much at stake. Now consumers do nearly 10% of their shopping online, a share that will grow exponentially in the future.

Read more here.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

You Might Also Like:

  • Apple Loses at the Supreme Court
  • India Targets E-Commerce Giants with new Rules
  • E-Commerce: Not Just for the West Anymore
  • Author
  • Recent Posts
Jeremy Jones, CFA
Jeremy Jones, CFA, CFP® is the Director of Research at Young Research & Publishing Inc., and the Chief Investment Officer at Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. was ranked #5 in CNBC's 2021 Financial Advisor Top 100. Jeremy is also a contributing editor of youngresearch.com.
Latest posts by Jeremy Jones, CFA (see all)
  • Are Google, Amazon, and Microsoft About to Crash This Specialized Real Estate Market? - June 29, 2022
  • Regulators’ Bungled Attempts to Cut Emissions Drove Oil Prices Higher - June 28, 2022
  • What Happens to Your Passwords When You Die? - June 27, 2022

Search Young Research

Most Popular

  • Will the Fed Stick to Its Course?
  • The Power of a Compound Interest Table
  • RECESSION? Dow 25,000, $8 Gas, Rising Interest Rates, Spell Mid-term Crack Up
  • Investing During a Recession
  • Vanguard Wellesley (VWINX) vs. Wellington (VWELX): Which Fund is Best?
  • Swiss National Bank Surprises World with Rate Hike
  • Kellogg Cuts Loose with Split Plan
  • Corporate Bond Yields: What You Can Earn Today
  • Apple Shares Resilient in the Face of Recession
  • Predictions of MEGA-SPENDING on Metaverse

Don’t Miss

Default Risk Among the Many Concerns with Annuities

Risk and Reward: An Efficient Frontier

How to be a Billionaire: Proven Strategies from the Titans of Wealth

Could this Be the Vanguard GNMA Winning Edge?

Cryptocosm and Life After Google

Warning: Avoid Mutual Fund Year End Distributions

Is Gold a Good Long-term Investment?

How to Invest in Gold

Vanguard Wellington (VWELX): The Original Balanced Fund

What is the Best Gold ETF for Investing and Trading?

Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock: The Only True Dividend King

The Dividend King of the North

You’ll Love This if You’re Dreaming of an Active Retirement Life

RSS The Latest at Richardcyoung.com

  • 10th AMENDMENT: Dobbs Decision a Win for States’ Rights
  • What Just Happened? Fixing Its Historic Mistake
  • Why Work When Taxes Take It All?
  • Oil Demand Increasing Despite Growth in Renewables
  • Why Is the USDA Burying the Facts on Low-Carb Diets?
  • These Normal Household Products Could Disrupt Your Endocrine System
  • Zelensky Asks G-7 for More Assistance Fighting Russia
  • AFGHAN WITHDRAWAL: State Department Accused of “Coverup”
  • Saudi Oil Is Different from U.S. Oil?
  • Your Survival Guy in Paris: Awakened from His Slumber, “Dad, I’m Going to London”

About Us

  • About Young Research
  • Archives
  • Contributors

Our Partners

  • Richard C. Young & Co.
  • Richardcyoung.com

Copyright © 2022 | Terms & Conditions

 

Loading Comments...
 

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.