A study by the GAO says that 401(k) plans with outdated rules about when employees become eligible to participate and how they receive matching funds could be shortchanging participants by over $400,000 during their retirement. Bloomberg reports:
A number of longtime 401(k) plan designs fail to reflect a new, more mobile workforce, hurting employees’ ability to save, according to the report (PDF). Among the arguably outmoded practices: a requirement at some plans that workers be 21 before becoming eligible to join a 401(k), that employees finish one year of service before being eligible to join a plan and then wait an additional year to be eligible for company matching funds, and that employees wait up to six years before laying claim to all those contributions.
Some of those practices save companies administrative hassles when workers leave after only a short time, and others help reduce turnover, employers and retirement experts told the GAO. But as the report notes, Bureau of Labor Statistics data show the median tenure for private sector workers in 2014 sits at 4.1 years, and federal data found that for workers aged 18 to 48, the average number of jobs held was more than 111.
“Being ineligible to save in a new employer’s plan for 1 year on 11 occasions, especially occurring more frequently early in a worker’s career, may result in $411,439 less retirement savings ($111,454 in 2016 dollars),” according to the GAO’s projections.
Latest posts by E.J. Smith (see all)
- Cheeseburgers in Newport, RI and the Fiduciary Rule - August 22, 2017
- The Trouble with this Bond Fund - August 21, 2017
- How an Introvert and DARPA Revolutionized Autonomous Vehicles - August 18, 2017